(Imagining) Science for Troubled Times: A Mouse, a Bird, and a Threshold for Collaboration

Rebecca Carlson

doi:10.17742/IMAGE.MM.12.2.9

Auteurs-es

Rebecca Carlson Toyo University, Japan

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.17742/IMAGE.MM.12.2.9

Résumé

Bien que la vie biologique et la complexité sociale humaine soient fondamentalement interdépendantes, les chercheurs en biologie et en sciences sociales continuent de se percevoir à travers les clivages du scepticisme théorique, méthodologique et institutionnel. Cet article considère le travail de frontière conversationnel entre les scientifiques qualitatifs et quantitatifs comme une performance rhétorique institutionnalisée qui limite leur coopération, même face à la pandémie de COVID-19 lorsque cela est le plus urgent. À titre d’exemple, j’examine la manière dont des conflits épistémologiques familiers ont émergé de la collaboration entre moi-même et un bioscientifique au printemps 2020, lorsque j’ai participé au Massive Microscopic Sensemaking Project, un projet internationale d’écriture auto-ethnographique de 21 jours.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Rebecca Carlson, Toyo University, Japan

Rebecca Carlson est anthropologue des médias et professeure associée à l'université Toyo au Japon, au département des sciences et des arts de l'information. Son intérêt actuel pour les frontières et les limites de la science et de la médecine est né d'un intérêt parallèle pour les frontières qui façonnent la circulation des jeux vidéo et de leurs fans. Actuellement, elle étudie la bioinformatique et les efforts visant à mondialiser la recherche scientifique biomédicale au Japon, avec le soutien de la subvention pour la recherche scientifique de la Société japonaise pour la promotion de la science.

Références

Allen, Joel Asaph. “Collation of Brisson’s genera of birds with those of Linnaeus.” Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 28, 1910, pp.317-335.

Appadurai, Arjun, ed. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Foucault, Michel. “Truth and Power.” Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977 by Michel Foucault, edited by C. Gordon. Brighton: Harvester, 1980, pp. 109-133.

Fullwiley, Duana. The Enculturated Gene: Sickle Cell Health Politics and Biological Difference in West Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Fullwiley, Duana. “The Molecularization of Race: Institutionalizing Human Difference in Pharmacogenetics Practice.” Science as Culture, vol.16, 2007, pp.1-30.

Fujimura, Joan H., Bolnick, Deborah A., Rajagopalan, Ramya, Kaufman, Jay S., Lewontin, Richard C., Duster, Troy, Ossorio, Pilar and Jonathan Marks. “Clines Without Classes: How to Make Sense of Human Variation.” Sociological Theory, vol. 32, no.3, 2014, pp.208-227.

Gieryn, Thomas F. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Gilbert, Scott F. “The reactive genome.” Origination of organismal form: Beyond the gene in developmental and evolutionary biology. Edited by Gerd. B. Müller and Stuart A. Newman. Boston: MIT Press, 2003, pp. 87-101.

Henley, Paul. Beyond Observation: A History of Authorship in Ethnographic Film. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 2020.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

Latour, Bruno. “Why has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, vol.30, 2005, pp.225-248.

Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.

Levi-Strauss, Claude. Totemism. Translated by Rodney Needham. Boston: Beacon Press, 1962.

Linnaeus, Carl. Systema Naturae. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae, 1748.

Lock, Margaret and Vinh-Kim Nguyen. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Oxford: Blackwell, Ltd, 2010.

Moats, David and Nick Seaver. “You Social Scientists Love Mind Games’’: Experimenting in the ‘‘divide’’ Between Data Science and Critical Algorithm Studies.” Big Data & Society, January-June, 2019, pp.1-11.

Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co, 1959.

Ruben, Robert J. “The Mouse: From Pet to Paradigm.” Otology Japan, vol.15, no.3, 2005, pp.259-264.

Seaver, Nick. “Against Access: Two Ethnographic Vignettes, One Malinowskian Anecdote, a Claim about Corporations, Algorithms, and Anthropological Field Sites, and an Argument about the Sexual Politics of Knowledge.” Society for Social Studies of Science, Boston, 2017.

Serre, David and Svante Pääbo. “Evidence for Gradients of Human Genetic Diversity Within and Among Continents.” Genome Research, vol.14, 2004, pp.1679-1685.

Steiner, Christopher B. “Rights of Passage: On the Liminal Identity of Art in the Border Zone.” The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture, edited by Fred R. Myer, Santa Fe: School of American Research, 1996, pp. 207-232.

Stoller, Paul. “Doing Anthropology in Troubled Times.” HuffPost, 27 Nov. 2017. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/doing-anthropology-in-troubled-times_b_5a1c4300e4b0e580b35371c5

Stoller, Paul. “The Negotiation of Songhay Space: Phenomenology in the Heart of Darkness.” American Ethnologist, vol.7, no.3, 1980, pp.419-431.

Tanave, Akira and Tsuyoshi Koide. “A Role for the Rare Endogenous Retrovirus β4 in Development of Japanese Fancy Mice.” Communications Biology, vol. 3, no.53, 2020, pp.1-3.

Teienshi. Chingan Sodategusa (How to Raise Rare Mice). Kyoto: Zeniya Chobe, 1787.

Tsing, Anna L. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.

Wise, Jacqui. “Covid-19: Known Risk Factors Fail to Explain the Increased Risk of Death Among People from Ethnic Minorities.” BMJ 369: m1873.11 May 2020.